AI Use Cases for Doctors

← Browse workflows

Inbox & messages

Start test-result notes from a plain-language draft

Patients see their results in the portal before I can explain them, then message me asking what the numbers mean.

Vendor report Needs a HIPAA agreement (BAA) Organization involvement

Source check: 2026-11-11 · Physician review: not yet recorded

The workflow

  1. Ask whether your health system has turned on Art's draft result notes in the Epic In Basket.
  2. Open a lab or imaging result and let Art write a first draft of the patient note in everyday words.
  3. Check every value and statement in the draft against the result itself and fix anything wrong or vague.
  4. Add your own interpretation and the next step, then send it under your name.

Tools and cost

USD unless stated otherwise. Billing periods and eligibility matter. A tool listed here was not necessarily tested in the cited study.

Epic Art (draft result notes in In Basket)
not verified · Price source
Needs your hospital: built into Epic and turned on by the health system; Epic's page gives no price.


What the evidence supports

Epic reports 32% fewer follow-up messages about results and nine seconds less writing time per comment at Memorial Hermann.

Primary product or guidance source · Read the source ↗

Where it goes wrong

These are vendor/customer figures without enough methods on the cited page to establish causation. A clinician must check accuracy and the degree of reassurance before sending.

← All use cases